Excercise 5.3

1.) Is what you have read, easy to comprehend?


2.) How well structured is my paper?


3.) Does everything seem to be in order?


4.) Is my main point/thesis easily read and understood?


5.) What could be done to make my paper more vivid?


6.) What could be different to make things more interresting?


(Book Work):
-Directing the Reader's Response
1.) The main question/thesis of my paper is: "When used with caution and responsibility, online dating can be beneficial. If a person of adequate age adn is aware of possible dangers then there is no reason to disregard online dating as another form of dating communication."

2.) The main point of my paper is to inform people that dating someone from the internet isn't such a bad thing after all. To be aware of all that goes on, to use your best judgement, and have fun. Online dating is another form of dating just like any other form(s) of dating go.

3.) Most convincing: To me, the entire paper is convincing, considering that I'm living it. I would say that the interviews and my personal story about Ben and I would be considered most.
- If not, then what all websites have to mention. Listed are all of what I've looked up, and the facts, opinions, tips and advice are all there clearly to read.

Least convincing: *People are going to have their own opinions, and they may disregard the entire paper. They can take my story and soak that in, or leave it where they finished reading.

4.) Most interresting: (To myself) would be this experience that I have gone through, and will continue to be involved in. I think that if I wasn't dating Ben, then I would have still met someone else online, and date them. (My personal story- interrests myself most.)